Taylor’s Travels: Closed beaches and climate change

The amount of closed and advisory days at America’s beaches spiked 29 percent last year to its highest level in the past 21 years, according to a recent report from the National Resource Defense Council (NRDC). Unfortunately, NRDC found that the region with the most frequently contaminated beachwater was the Great Lakes, where 15% of beachwater samples exceeded health standards. In addition, the top ten list of U.S. beaches with the most persistent contamination problems included two Wisconsin beaches: Eichelman Beach in Kenosha county and South Shore Beach in Milwaukee.

The majority of these closures and advisories were issued due to high bacteria levels in the water, indicating the presence of human or animal waste. The primary sources of these pollutants are stormwater runoff and sewage overflow. Climate change is causing this contamination to become more frequent, explaining the 29% increase in national beach closures from 2009. According to the Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts (WICCI), climate change will cause heavy rainfall events to increase, leading to beach contamination becoming more frequent and widespread due to increased water runoff levels.

The Great Lakes provide recreation to over 30 million people, and we need to ensure that these lakes are protected from contamination from polluted runoff and sewage. While visiting a beach on Lake Michigan, I talked to some beachgoers about their favorite parts of the Great Lakes. One of the beachgoers said that his favorite part of spending time at the lake was, “getting back in touch with nature, because it’s easy to forget about it when you don’t necessarily appreciate it during your daily life.” Another woman I spoke with said, “I love the peacefulness that the lake makes me feel. The fresh air… the relaxing feeling I get from coming here and walking along the shore is something I can’t get in many other places.”

This peaceful and relaxing quality along with the fresh air that the Great Lakes provide is in jeopardy due to increasing pollution, and one of the beachgoers I talked to shared this concern when he said, “I think the pollution of the lakes is what scares me the most. Just the acidity of the water and the sewage that leaks into it. The amount of foreign stuff in the lakes today is just awful, and it’s going to start causing some problems, if it hasn’t already.”

The Great Lakes are a recreational outlet for over 30 million people, and it’s important that we understand why this contamination is occurring as well as recognize and implement solutions to the problem. The best way to keep pollution out of the Great Lakes is to prevent it from the start by using smarter, greener infrastructure on land, including green roofs, parks, and rain barrels. These innovations allow precipitation to filter back into the ground naturally instead of running off into the lakes, reducing the amount of contamination that gets into the Great Lakes. Another beachgoer I spoke to said that her favorite parts about the lake are, “the sounds, the sights, the smells, all of the senses of nature. The air just smells different when you come to the lake.” By working towards keeping the lakes clean, we can maintain the beautiful sounds, sights, and smells of our Great Lakes.

-Contributed by Taylor Lundberg, Water Intern.

Green Lakes: The Tipping Point

Sam Weis, our media specialist, recently wrote about the impact our visit to the Tainter-Menomin Lakes had on him. He called the lakes ticking time bombs because these gorgeous bodies of water would, in a matter of weeks, be green, toxic and dangerous. The magnitude of this issue is shocking to many people; frequently, I’m not sure people believe what I’m telling them about water quality problems until they see pictures.

My personal reaction to our trip was somewhat different. The problems with blue-green algae and other problems caused by rural runoff are no doubt shocking –how can the country that took a man to the moon nearly 50 years ago let such an important problem languish? – but I’ve been pondering this for years. What struck me more than anything was that this could be just the beginning. Lake health is not a black and white problem where you have good lakes and bad lakes, it’s a tipping point problem; as problems accumulate, there is a point at which the lake system can no longer manage the pollution. You know you’ve reached it when the lake glows green.

Lakes Tainter and Menomin are not bad lakes that we should categorize as green lakes; rather, they are merely more vulnerable to algae blooms than other Wisconsin lakes. If we continue to spill phosphorus and nutrients into our waterways across the state, other waters will start glowing green at that toxic tipping point.

The unease settling in me was validated with recent news that an Ohio lake succumbed to toxic blue-green algae contamination already – a full month before it has ever had algae warnings before. Beaches closed before the swimming season even begins. Bays and entire shorelines filled with a pea-soup-like mixture that you can’t step in or be near. Threats to people’s health and their pets.

I’m worried about this happening to Wisconsin waters earlier and earlier each year.

I like to talk about solutions, but solutions are only as good as the paper they’re dreamed up on if no one takes action. Fortunately, we’ve got a new tool to finally address our phosphorus and algae problems. The phosphorus rule has a management option that lets all of us work together with permitted entities to find the most cost-effective ways to clean up our waterways. The “effective” part of cost-effective is what’s important: we do have affordable options by which to actually clean up our waters.

We need to get started on them now.

-contributed by Melissa Malott, water program director

Committee Votes to Repeal Clean Water Rules

Unfortunate news to report today…  

Last night the Joint Finance Committee voted to pass a measure that would require the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to repeal and recreate NR151, one of the most important rules that helps protect Wisconsin waters.

For more information, please check out the press release below.  Also, please stay tuned as we’ll be bringing you more information on this and asking you to take action in the coming days!

The release:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: May 25, 2011

Committee Votes to Repeal Clean Water Rules

Measure must be fixed to protect Wisconsin’s lakes, rivers and streams

MADISON – In a surprising move last night, the Joint Finance Committee voted on party lines to pass a measure that would require the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to repeal and recreate NR151, a decade-old rule package that protects Wisconsin’s lakes, rivers and streams from pollution running off of farm fields, construction zones and city streets.

“These flexible, commonsense rules are some of the only things that stand between our beautiful waters and pollution like cow manure, pesticides, oil and other toxic substances,” said Amber Meyer Smith, director of programs and government relations at Clean Wisconsin. “Repealing this package would leave Wisconsin’s beautiful lakes, rivers and streams extremely vulnerable.”

Pollution that runs off of farm fields, parking lots, construction zones and city streets, referred to as nonpoint source pollution, is the major cause of polluted waters in Wisconsin. Since 2002, NR151 has helped reduce this pollution by setting standards for manure and nutrient runoff from agricultural lands and by requiring developers and municipalities to reduce runoff from urban areas.

“Runoff is the largest source of pollution in Wisconsin’s waters,” said Smith. “Wisconsin’s lakes, rivers and streams are central to the identity and economic health of our state. Erasing one of the cornerstone protections for our waters is dangerous and shortsighted.”

While the measure does charge the DNR with recreating the rule, advocates agree that this would likely result in weakened standards that would fail to adequately protect Wisconsin’s waters, nearly half of which are already listed as impaired by the federal government.

“Repealing decade-old rules and starting from scratch would create great regulatory uncertainty and leave our beautiful waters at risk,” said Smith. “The people of Wisconsin care deeply about the health of our waters and this dangerous provision must be removed from the budget.”

###

 

Clean Wisconsin, an environmental advocacy organization, protects Wisconsin’s clean water and air and advocates for clean energy by being an effective voice in the state legislature and by holding elected officials and polluters accountable. Founded in 1970 as Wisconsin’s Environmental Decade, Clean Wisconsin exposes corporate polluters, makes sure existing environmental laws are enforced, and educates citizens and businesses. On behalf of its 10,000 members and its coalition partners, Clean Wisconsin protects the special places that make Wisconsin such a wonderful place to live, work and play. 608-251-7020, information@cleanwisconsin.org, www.cleanwisconsin.org.

-Contributed by Sam Weis

It Stinks to Fish in a Green Lake

As a kid, my dad convinced my siblings and I to give our mom a fishing pole as a Mother’s Day gift several years in a row. Of course, we thought it was a great idea since it meant we’d be doing plenty of fishing, but Mom wasn’t as enthusiastic.

Aside from the obvious fact that it had become a gag gift, fishing, something that should be relaxing and rewarding, was work for my mom. Why? She was the only one who could take the bullheads we’d catch off the line without getting stung by the barbs on their fins. With five kids casting lines, that’s a lot of bullheads.

Green, stinky and gross

Catching a bullhead isn’t that exciting, but it was the only thing that lived in our pond.

I grew up on a homestead farm in south-central Wisconsin, 200 acres of fields, wetlands and woodlands. And a spring-fed pond that, through my youth, was either surrounded by crops or cattle. The land, my dad would say, was too valuable to let lie fallow. While there are bottom-line benefits to our hardworking farmers for planting more corn or allowing cattle to graze freely, doing so within yards of a water body can have devastating effects on its ecosystem.

And that’s why Mom spent her summer nights handling the bullheads.

In the 1980s, crop farming included heavy doses of herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers, which contain phosphorus. Cow manure also contains a large amount of phosphorus. A nutrient for plants, phosphorus gets picked up rainwater or snowmelt and is washed off fields into neighboring water bodies and waterways. In the water, it causes overgrowth of aquatic plants and algae; algal blooms can be dangerous to humans, pets and aquatic life. As these algal blooms grow and cover water’s surface and eventually die and decay, creating a blanket that blocks sunlight from entering the water. This kills the plants below and reduces oxygen, food and shelter for fish.

YUCK! A brown bullhead

Except bullheads.

Species like bullheads, suckers, redhorse and carp, dubbed “rough fish” and undesirable to most anglers, can live in these subpar waters; some, like bullheads, can thrive on little oxygen and even live on the algae and fish that die because of the warm, stinking habitat created by these blooms. In the ’80s, when our family spent many summer nights and weekend afternoons at the pond, it had become a haven for bullheads. By the 1990s, after years of being inundated with phosphorus-filled runoff from the fields and cattle and around the same time my four siblings and I couldn’t stand to spend time with one another, the pond had become a green, gross, stinking mess.

Like our pond, phosphorus is devastating prime fishing waters around the state; here’s an interesting map from the DNR on waters and watersheds that have been impaired by the stuff. In 2010, a set of state rules were adopted that would cost effectively reduce the amount of phosphorus entering our waterways and, over time, greatly improve and protect water quality. Though it’s a non-budget item, Gov. Scott Walker wants to delay implementation of this set of vital phosphorus rules for two years in budget bill. This delay is harmful and unnecessary; communities are already committed and coming together to clean up their waterways.

Back at the farm, the pond is slowly recovering; some time in the late 1990s, my dad came around to the fact that heavy fertilizers were a bad choice (and getting extremely expensive) and he moved the pasture away from the pond. But cleaning up a water body is no easy task; it takes years for phosphorus to cycle through its ecosystem. We need action today, not two years from now.

It really stinks to fish in a green lake (or pond, as it were). Don’t believe it? I’m sure my mom would be happy to teach you how to take a bullhead off the line without getting stunned. It will be a valuable skill in the future if we don’t take polluted runoff and phosphorus pollution seriously.

 

–Contributed by Amanda Wegner, Media Specialist